Wednesday, March 23, 2011

New energy plan stresses the Chinese automotive industry holding

Nissan test drive event held in Beijing, the first Nissan electric vehicle LEAF “Master Wind” performance beyond the media’s psychological expectations, while at the same time, Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn’s sentence dell studio 1745 battery, dell studio 1747 battery words also ignited the “electric car technology transfer that” spark. Prior to this, multinational car firms have said publicly that the electric cars in China for joint venture premised on concerns about market access. In their view, China’s independent intellectual property rights and to emphasize the equivalent of a controlling interest of foreign auto companies was announced in China can not continue to have both the dual advantage of technology and market.

Wishful thinking

Unlimited transfer said”

September 20, at a press conference in Zhengzhou Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn said in public that is negotiating with the Dongfeng Motor Group, to consider the electric car technology transfer to joint venture operations in China, the two sides, including cutting-edge The lithium-ion battery expertise. And claims, “The Nissan, in bringing technology to the Chinese market without any restrictions.”

His remark, full house are scared, and immediately cross-car prices is considered China’s “electric car 10-year plan” to make the first positive response. Under this plan, foreign car manufacturers choose production and marketing in China and the plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, it will be facing a “critical hp pavilion dm3 battery, hp pavilion dm4 battery technology transfer” issue.

However, soon, Nissan aspects of Ghosn to “share technology” generous attitude was clear, said Nissan was still considering whether to produce in China, “Master wind” electric vehicles, not yet made any decision. Worried about the cross-car prices, when the episode will be foreign and joint-venture electric car market access to the premise of this sensitive topic was officially placed on the desktop. The two sides also makes foreign joint venture in electric cars come to the fore in the game technically.

Market for Technology, said,” to reproduce

In fact, starting from early September, began to cross-border car prices in China’s electric car plan views. Prior to this, in general, represented by cross-car prices for imported electric cars just can not enjoy the subsidy policy been complaining.

The stimulus is the cross-car prices has exposed the “car with the new energy automotive industry development plan” (2011-2020) Bill, that is planning electric vehicles for decades. According to the “planning”, the new car battery, driving motor, the vehicle control system, key parts of new energy vehicles need to have independent R & D joint ventures and intellectual property capabilities, the Chinese equity ratio not less than 51%.

According to several media reports, China’s electric car venture in the “intellectual property” and “controlling interest” also makes emphasis on the multinational giants worry about “The Chinese government plans dell inspiron mini 10 battery, dell inspiron 1525 battery to develop electric cars may force foreign producers to share art with Chinese companies technology, in exchange for permission to enter China’s huge market. “reported, a global automotive manufacturer’s senior technical managers believe that China will by 2020 be electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids in the major markets, in China’s domestic production of electric cars is inevitable. And most of the multinational car firms are more willing to use their existing joint venture in China to produce electric cars and their spare parts. Transport costs and tariffs make exports from other parts of China sales of the car is too expensive.

In addition, China plans to form in 10 years 3-5 of new energy automobile enterprises, the formation of 2-3 with independent intellectual property and furniture internationally competitive power batteries, motors and other key parts of the backbone enterprises, the industrial concentration 80% or more. It also had to multinational giants are worried that their current field in the traditional toshiba pa3634u-1bas battery, toshiba pa3728u-1brs battery automotive technology to the Chinese market advantage and market dominance will not be replicated in the new energy vehicles.

Technology sharing is double-edged sword

It is noteworthy that, in the field of electric vehicle technology, China is not the same as conventional vehicles of collective behind. BYD car prices represented some of the core technology in battery manufacturing, and other areas regarded as advantages. This means that the Ten-Year Plan in the “technology sharing” provision is likely to be a double-edged sword.

This, in circumvention technology sharing BYD also a sensitive issue. BYD Auto executives said recently associated, and the cooperation and opening Mercedes-Benz electric vehicles is not necessarily related to core technology. According to his interpretation of the mode of cooperation is to provide Mercedes-Benz vehicle platform technology, BYD electric vehicle power system to provide core technology, the two sides will launch a new electric car brand, developing the Chinese market.

Experts point out that, as an important new industry, new energy is in the norm-setting period, not only in China, countries in the development of their own targets and market supervision industry norms. For China, the new energy related to the strength of the national development strategy for the future industry, setting access conditions is to prevent foreign advanced technology company formed in China again, technology monopoly. And can not be ignored is that “planning” for new energy vehicles and the development and production of key parts out, including exemption from business tax, income tax benefits and priority access to bank credit support, priority support dell studio 1749 battery, dell studio p02e battery public financing of its preferential policies such as a rich . It is clear that “planning” to achieve a new energy industry and corporate investors in the win.

No comments:

Post a Comment